在 Linux 下 top 工具可以显示 cpu 的平均利用率(user,nice,system,idle,iowait,irq,softirq,etc.),可以显示每个 cpu 的利用率。但是无法显示每个线程的 cpu 利用率情况,
这时就可能出现这种情况,总的 cpu 利用率中 user 或 system 很高,但是用进程的 cpu 占用率进行排序时,没有进程的 user 或 system 与之对应。
可以用下面的命令将 cpu 占用率高的线程找出来: ps H -eo user,pid,ppid,tid,time,%cpu,cmd –sort=%cpu
正式版扩大了操作系统支持范围,将支持所有开箱即用的Linux发行版,任 何用户想使用的内核或软件如Docker、FOG、xfs和aufs,加入了SUSE和Red Hat Enterprise Linux的初步支持,支持FreeBSD。
价格嘛,也比较亲民。 IP不收费,I/O不收费。
关键是google的服务安全可靠,让人用了放心。
最最关键的是:在Google上创建VPS,发布网站,不用备案!不用备案!
对中小站长来说,强制ICP备案,是国内云服务的硬伤,是很多人选择出走的原因。
Pricing
All machine types are charged a minimum of 10 minutes. For example, if you run your instance for 2 minutes, you will be billed for 10 minutes of usage. After 10 minutes, instances are charged in 1 minute increments, rounded up to the nearest minute. For example, an instance that lives for 11.25 minutes will be charged for 12 minutes of usage.
If you would like to discuss pricing for long-term commitments, please contact sales
Friday October 26, 2007 by Jason ‘vanRijn’ Kasper | 15 Comments
I did a small performance test yesterday and was very surprised by the results. I wanted to see which encrypted filesystem was faster betweeen Truecrypt and LUKS. I created 2 20-gig files, one with Truecrypt and the other with LUKS encryption. Then I mounted the encrypted files and copied a 180 meg file 10 times, synced, and then reported the time taken. Here’s the results:
Truecrypt test:
time (for f in $(seq 1 10); do; cp bigfile truecrypt-mnt/bigfile-$f; done;)
0.22s user 26.30s system 15% cpu 2:47.06 total
LUKS test:
time (for f in $(seq 1 10); do; cp bigfile luks-mnt/bigfile-$f; done;)
0.20s user 8.40s system 15% cpu 55.169 total
Wow. Now, granted, this is a simple enough test, but does anyone have any ideas why LUKS would be 3 times faster in writing 1.8 Gigs than Truecrypt?
http://movingparts.net/2007/10/26/truecrypt-versus-luks-speed-test/